Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Perceptions of Disease State Management Among Pakistani Hypertensive Patients: Findings from a Focus Group Discussion

F Saleem1, M A Hassali1 , A A Shafie1, S Bashir2, M Atif3

1Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia; 2Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan; 3Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia.

For correspondence:-  M Hassali   Email: azmihassali@usm.my   Tel:+6046534085

Received: 1 June 2011        Accepted: 14 November, 2011        Published: 25 December 2011

Citation: Saleem F, Hassali MA, Shafie AA, Bashir S, Atif M. Perceptions of Disease State Management Among Pakistani Hypertensive Patients: Findings from a Focus Group Discussion. Trop J Pharm Res 2011; 10(6):833-840 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v10i6.18

© 2011 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the perceptions of disease state management among Pakistani hypertensive patients.
Methods: A focus group discussion was conducted with 19 hypertensive patients in order to obtain an insight into their self-management practices. The study was conducted in Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
Results: Analysis of the focus group discussion yielded four major themes: (1) effect of hypertension on patients’ physical, mental and social states; (2) involvement in self-management; (3) factors contributing to self-management; and (4) perception of patients towards antihypertensive agents. A majority of the patients admitted that they were involved in self-management of hypertension but their management strategies were influenced by social sources - peer or family - with very little information received from health care professionals. Exercise of self-management was strongly linked to the philosophy of the patients regarding nature of drug, as well as comparative advantages and disadvantages. Patients also expressed reservations about continuous drug usage for the management of chronic illnesses.
Conclusion: Patients suffering from chronic diseases such as hypertension tend to make individual and personal decisions about managing their illnesses. Patients seem to be more influenced by peers, family members and people with the disease condition, and thus try to manage their condition based on advice received from them. In addition, their philosophy  of medication use and hypertension (being a chronic disease) prompts them to focus more on self-management practices. 

Keywords: Self-management, Focus group, Hypertension, Perception

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates